Tuesday 10 April 2007

Canaan

You will have noted in the introductions section that one of the definitions given (again, not my own!) for the promised land was;

Canaan, the land promised by God to Abraham and his descendants. Gen. 12:7.

This is of course correct. You know the story well. God spoke to Abram the nomad promising him that his offspring would become a nation, that they would be given a land, that they would receive blessing and that they would be a blessing. God used Moses to bring Abraham's (God changed Abram's name) descendents out of Egypt and into Canaan, the land that God identified as the one promised. Of course Israel, abraham's 'nation', had to go on and inhabit this land, which they achieved with some questionable success in terms of obedience to God. The high point is Solomon, God's king to whom other nations came to seek wisdom and bring homage.
Several hundred years later Abraham's nation was exiled out of the land because of their disobedience to God (God had said he would do so!).
They came back (after some middle eastern regime change) under persian rule to re-establish their nationhood of sorts, but the glory days were behind them. Their destiny determined by whichever world power held sway at the time.

In Jesus day the Jewish people (Abraham's descendents by ethnicity) had various approaches to rationalising the way in which God's promise of land was being experienced in their time. Some were pragmatists, believing that they could have a kind of self rule and self determination by 'getting along' with the current world power (Rome). Some were political zealots, believing that the promise required them to rise up and take the back the land that was theirs by divine right. Some were religious zealots (humanists of a sort?), believing God would give them back the land if they could demonstrate a great enough devotion to him.Some were spiritualists, believing that land was not so significant anymore and that they were to carve out their identity in other ways (torah, teaching, wisdom).
Jewish people to this day fall into one of these, or a combination of these, categories.
As an aside I think the conservative political movements within the county of Israel today would best be categorised as Jewish political zealots, and you can maybe see why they are so militant in their ways, and how they might interpret the 'attacks' on their land.

But, is God's promise of land relevant to any of these groups anymore?

7 comments:

Laura T said...

I was trying to explain to a girl in a uni small group that after Jesus non-Christian Jews are no longer the people of God. Yet I felt sick just saying it. Before Jesus the Jews hoped in a faithful God of promise and rescue who dwelled in their presence. Are they now really now completely cut off from all these promises? Do their prayers fall flat? Do they worship an empty shell? Are they no different to any non-Christian?

Jill said...

Recently I read an article in the Sydney Morning Herald which described the 'phenonmenon' of Australian Jews migrating back to Israel.

The process is called "aliyah", which in Hebrew means to ascend.

Apparently Australia has one of the highest per capita rates of aliyah in the Western world. Since 1948 (when modern state of Israel was established), almost 10,000 Australians have migrated back.
Ref: The Pull of the Promised Land
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/pull-of-the-promised-land/2007/03/22/1174153258406.html?page=2

Aliyah is regarded as an important Jewish cultural concept and a fundamental concept of Zionism that is enshrined in Israel's Law of Return, which permits any Jew the legal right to assisted immigration and settlement in Israel, as well as automatic Israeli citizenship.

Many Jews adopt aliyah as a return to the Promised land.

Philip Britton said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Philip Britton said...

Very interesting Jill. Thanks for the input.

Big questions Laura!
Do they worship and empty shell?
Jesus teaches, quite provocatively I think, that the authenticity of people's worship of God (the God of Abraham) is judged by how they respond to him. Otherwise they cannot truly be called children of Abraham. I think it is true to say as Archbishop Michael Ramsey once put it — 'God is Christlike and in God there is no unChristlikeness at all'.
(John 8:12-19, 8:31-47, 12:44-46)

Do their prayers fall flat?
The prayers of those who are not "In Christ" do not fall flat in as much as they are seeking prayers ("seek and you shall find, knock and the door will be opened") and in as much as they are prayers answered through general grace ("He makes the sun shine on the good and the evil"). Some would say the first type of prayers are evidence of Gods regenerating work and of the second type that general grace is in fact in answer to prayers of and for the sake of those who are or will become 'In Christ'.

Are they now really now completely cut off from all these promises? & Are they no different to any non-Christian?
Without having the time or the ability to do justice to Romans 9-11, suffice it to say the the jewish people are not like other gentile non-christians in a sense. They were intrusted with the very oracles of God, and received the mosaic law. They have seen the God and Father of Jesus working amongst their ancestors. The covenant of God with the Patriachs is still being worked out in some mysterious way. It is true however that no-one will be saved apart from the Christ, who is Jesus.

Come back to me with some thoughts so we can develop this.

Jill said...

I am probably completely out of my depth in this conversation, so feel free to disregard...
I think of Cornelius (Acts 10). Cornelius was 'devout and God-fearing' but he was not a follower of Jesus. He was not a Christian. Cornelius prayed to God and God sent an angel. The angel said "Your prayers and gifts to the poor have come up as a memorial offering before God". Surely then, God heard Cornelius' prayers and the result was Peter "realising that God does not show favouritism but accepts men from every nation who fear him and do what is right."
I guess this is an example of God answering the prayers of one who would become 'in Christ'.

Laura T said...

Thanks for your replies Phil and Jill. I guess I just cuts me really deep that the Jews have such a mindblowing history of relationship with the living God, yet they are blind to their Messiah. It's like preparing for a marriage, then when your stunning bride walks down the aisle you can't see them, so you wait misrably forever alone. The tragity is almost unstomachable. But I guess in truth so often in the history of Israel their worship was 'emtpy' because of their hearts and thus they unplugged from the blessings of God's promises. I find this a real challange keep my heart plugged into God. How gutting would it be for a devout Jew not to be recognised by God at Judgement? Yet the danger is the same for any Christian who looses God in the clutter of 'religion'.

Jill said...

I'm with you Laura. I find the history of the Jews so heart-wrenching. As a people they have been persecuted so terribly and antisemitism is still so rife. Of course the biggest tragedy of all, far worse than the holocaust, is eternal damnation. I think that we should pray that God will be merciful and work in the lives of Jews - remove their blindfolds to see Jesus as the one true Messiah.
A couple of organisations - one of which is Jews for Jesus- are doing significant amount of outreach work amongst Jewish communities both here in Australia and abroad.
You can check out Jews for Jesus at www.jewsforjesus.org
Regarding a devout Jew not being recognised by God at judgement, I guess all we can say is that we know that no one can come to the Father except through Jesus. John 6:44 "No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him, and I will raise him up at the last day."

None of us deserve salvation and it is only through God's astonishing grace that any of us are saved.